Who Is Responsible for Safeguarding Judicial Independence?
According to the source Kun.uz, the High Judicial Council holds direct responsibility for ensuring the independence of the judiciary and protecting judges from external interference. A number of practical measures were implemented in this direction during the reporting period.
How Many Judges Were Dismissed Before the End of Their Term?
During the reporting period, the powers of 59 judges were terminated ahead of schedule. Of these, 19 judges were removed for violating their judicial oath and failing to comply with the Code of Judicial Ethics.
Additionally, 3 judges were held criminally liable, while 58 were demoted. Upon the expiration of their terms, 33 judges were deemed unsuitable for reappointment. In total, 266 judges were subjected to disciplinary measures.
How Were Cases of Interference in Court Activities Addressed?
Over the past year, 5 submissions were filed with the Prosecutor General’s Office concerning instances of interference in judicial activities. Furthermore, the Council introduced an online mechanism on its official website allowing rapid reporting of violations of judicial immunity.
More than 6,000 orders issued by regional court chairpersons were reviewed. It was found that 231 orders assigned 314 judges duties unrelated to the administration of justice. Concrete corrective measures were subsequently taken.
Why Is a “Judicial Administration” Institution Being Proposed?
To relieve judges of responsibilities not directly related to adjudication, a proposal was made to establish a “judicial administration” institution. This body would oversee court staff management, logistical support, and organizational matters. The initiative предусматривает изучение передового зарубежного опыта.
How Will the Disciplinary System Be Improved?
To further strengthen judicial independence and immunity, it has been proposed to create a Judicial Disciplinary Board. This body would ensure an impartial and transparent process for imposing disciplinary sanctions on judges.
Additional initiatives include introducing asset declarations for judges and their family members, implementing a compliance oversight system to prevent corruption among court staff, and establishing a transparent recruitment process within the court administration.
How Was Gender Equality Addressed?
Within the framework of state policy aimed at supporting women, the issue of promoting gender equality within the judicial system was also discussed. Plans were outlined to mark March 10 — International Day of Women Judges.
What Recommendations Did the President Provide?
The President endorsed the proposed initiatives and offered a number of recommendations aimed at consistently advancing systemic reforms to strengthen judicial independence, safeguard judicial immunity, and eliminate factors hindering the delivery of fair justice.